lim0-app
< DRAFT++ >
< #DEV >
A general distributed provisioning vision & application specification.
Ties to 🔗lim0.
Revisions:
xxxx stub
20201102 new file + overview D+L
20201209 →D
Ties to:
* (list below)
* https://eotl.supply
* 🔗protocol-ordering
* #cuba
* [...]
Table of Contents
¶Basics
I want a general list of all resources that, as a HOUSEHOLD MANAGER, I am supposed to maintain.
Currently @ totalism.org:
→ 🔗resources
→ 🔗food
→ 🔗lim0
→ 🔗laptop
→ 🔗ordering
[...] ###
I want a general list of all resources that, as a HOUSEHOLD MANAGER, I am supposed to maintain.
Currently @ totalism.org:
→ 🔗resources
→ 🔗food
→ 🔗lim0
→ 🔗laptop
→ 🔗ordering
[...] ###
¶Regularity
The UI "design goal" is the typical wholesale order template:
a list of items + optional quantities.
Closest to this is how we currently use 🔗food.
This is a list I interact with weekly all my life. I know it well:
* Might add / remove some things sometimes
* Test new things
* re-prioritize items as tastes change
... but basically, it is more about:
1) CYCLES OF THE SAME THING
2) introducing small changes
3) priorities of MUST HAVE, variety of NICE TO HAVE
The UI "design goal" is the typical wholesale order template:
a list of items + optional quantities.
Closest to this is how we currently use 🔗food.
This is a list I interact with weekly all my life. I know it well:
* Might add / remove some things sometimes
* Test new things
* re-prioritize items as tastes change
... but basically, it is more about:
1) CYCLES OF THE SAME THING
2) introducing small changes
3) priorities of MUST HAVE, variety of NICE TO HAVE
¶ * Designated representatives help develop your template
You're not taking magnesium? You should.
You're not eating enough fruit. Don't agree? Express you don't trust me (+say why).
You're not taking magnesium? You should.
You're not eating enough fruit. Don't agree? Express you don't trust me (+say why).
¶ * Priority list ( → Cutting )
We have everything, except the things we can't have.
We don't create shopping sets, but *prioretized lists*.
We always run out of money. At some point, things are "cut", and not included anymore.
We have everything, except the things we can't have.
We don't create shopping sets, but *prioretized lists*.
We always run out of money. At some point, things are "cut", and not included anymore.
¶( UI do's and don'ts )
DO NOT WANT:
* submenus and clickable categories
DO WANT:
* Additional info on hover
* instant narrowing search field
* ... can't find?:
go straight to 🔗ordering and design a "new request"
DO NOT WANT:
* submenus and clickable categories
DO WANT:
* Additional info on hover
* instant narrowing search field
* ... can't find?:
go straight to 🔗ordering and design a "new request"
¶Mutualize all your stuff !
aka HOLDINGS / DUES
(various more or less non-consumables)
→ 🔗postmarket (holdings)
→ 🔗postmarket-stuff
aka HOLDINGS / DUES
(various more or less non-consumables)
→ 🔗postmarket (holdings)
→ 🔗postmarket-stuff
¶ * Spontaneous sourcing
Wow, this is an amazing deal. it's already on the list / i'm sure (myself) that i should get it for vault
Wow, this is an amazing deal. it's already on the list / i'm sure (myself) that i should get it for vault
¶ * Delivery (← Vaults)
* some will be delivered from central vault, or I pick them up there packed, or unpacked
* ... maybe from several vaults
* some will be delivered from central vault, or I pick them up there packed, or unpacked
* ... maybe from several vaults
¶ * Fallback: Self-sourcing
... maybe not even in storage:
→ have to acquire myself:
→ the funds are made available to me
... maybe not even in storage:
→ have to acquire myself:
→ the funds are made available to me
¶ Problem: inviting (non-comrade) people over and cook them a meal:
→ have a communique strategy
→ write off as personal
→ have a communique strategy
→ write off as personal
¶*** PAD
<------------------------ ((new))
"""
the bigger problem is distribution, & stock/inventory.
who would you give these pills to?
think about it:
i had the pills X needed I think.
but there's no "service" to document what we have, what we don't
"""
"""
yes exactly.
a communist inventory management, with puts and calls for supplies as well. and opinionated defaults
("everyone needs frijoles, rice, duct tape")
"""
<------------------------ ((new))
"""
the bigger problem is distribution, & stock/inventory.
who would you give these pills to?
think about it:
i had the pills X needed I think.
but there's no "service" to document what we have, what we don't
"""
"""
yes exactly.
a communist inventory management, with puts and calls for supplies as well. and opinionated defaults
("everyone needs frijoles, rice, duct tape")
"""